Securities • Issues & Advocacy
Ontario criticized over passport stance
JANET MCFARLAND
Globe and Mail, May 29, 2007
TORONTO -- The Ontario government is sending a
"controlling" signal to the rest of the country by refusing to join a
new passport system for securities regulation unless other provinces
agree to its terms, British Columbia's top regulator said yesterday.
The heads of securities commissions from B.C.,
Alberta, Manitoba and Quebec spoke in Toronto yesterday to try to build
support for the proposed passport system on Bay Street - the centre of
greatest opposition to the idea in Canada.
The passport model would permit companies and
market participants to seek registration approvals in one province and
have them automatically accepted everywhere else.
Ontario is the only province that has refused to
join, arguing there must be a clear road map to evolve the system into a
national securities commission in which each province and territory
would have a single vote in its operation.
Doug Hyndman, chairman of the British Columbia
Securities Commission, said Ontario has attempted to reassure the rest
of the country that it would not dominate a national body. But he said
the message is undermined by its demands to set terms for the passport's
evolution before it will join.
"Ontario is saying, 'We want to control this, we
want to exercise control.' That's kind of disappointing," Mr. Hyndman
said. "I think ultimatums are not productive, in that kind of an
environment, for making progress."
Alberta Securities Commission chairman Bill Rice
said the passport system is simpler to use than the existing regime and
will lead to faster decisions for applicants.
And while registrants will still have to pay fees
to every province and territory, they will save money because they won't
have to hire lawyers to prepare filings in any province except their
home jurisdiction.
But some in the audience questioned whether the
passport model will address all gaps in Canada's regulations.
"Is this a move to entrench the current
multiregulator system," asked Doug Steiner, CEO of Perimeter Financial
Corp.
Mr. Hyndman replied that the passport model is an
effort to improve the existing system while politicians debate a
national regulator.
Lawyer Phil Anisman told the meeting it is
difficult to assess the passport proposal because there is no detail
about how it would work for participants if Ontario does not join.
Mr. Hyndman said regulators are still discussing
that question.
One suggestion, he said, would be a "one-way
passport" in which Ontario companies could apply in their home province
and have registrations automatically accepted elsewhere. |